SEND Learning Strategy
LS030: Selective mutism - response hierarchy for demonstrating learning
Selective mutism is anxiety-based; use staged safe routes so understanding can be demonstrated consistently.
Use a predictable no-forced-speaking response ladder and widen participation only when readiness is secure.
Back to SEND learning strategiesImplementation steps
- Agree a staged response ladder with the student and key adults with no forced speaking.
- Define acceptable demonstration routes: pointing, cards, written response, whisper to trusted adult, or recorded audio.
- Train staff to use the same ladder consistently across lessons and settings.
- Build predictable participation routines with stable question and response formats.
- Only widen participation when readiness is secure and specialist guidance supports it.
- Frame selective mutism support as anxiety-led communication support and align classroom practice with the agreed plan.
- Define wait-time expectations (including extended pause) and no-pressure prompting for response moments.
Classroom routines
- Start with non-verbal checks such as whiteboards, matching, highlighting, or pointing.
- Use partner relay where agreed: student writes or points and partner voices response.
- Provide a trusted-adult check-in route for key assessment moments.
- Avoid public pressure and allow pass without consequence.
- Reinforce outcomes: you have shown understanding.
- Use the agreed response hierarchy consistently across adults and lesson types.
- Use low-arousal prompts and avoid repeated verbal pressure when no response appears.
- Protect non-verbal and low-verbal success routes in assessment moments.
Adaptation guidance
- Keep response options visible and predictable.
- Reduce novelty in assessment formats.
- Coordinate with anxiety participation ladders where appropriate.
- Use low-arousal transitions into response moments.
- Align classroom routine with wider pastoral and specialist plans.
- Treat changes in staff, room, or routine as transition points that may require resetting the response plan.
- Coordinate with graded participation pathways so speaking is never the only route to demonstrate learning.
- Keep peer attention low and avoid public targets related to speaking.
Staff language prompts
- Show me your answer using your chosen method.
- You can point, write, or use the card with the same success criteria.
- I will give you time. You do not have to speak.
- Your understanding matters more than speaking out loud.
- You can use your agreed method; speaking is not required to show understanding.
- I will give you time and keep the same success criteria.
Pitfalls to avoid
- Forced speaking or pressure to just try speaking publicly.
- Treating non-speaking as defiance.
- Changing response expectations unpredictably.
- Using high-pressure public response as default assessment route.
- Using praise, reward, or sanction pressure to force public speech.
- Treating silence as defiance and abandoning the agreed response hierarchy.
Impact checks
- Increased frequency of demonstrated understanding.
- Reduced avoidance in participation moments.
- Gradual widening of safe response options over time.
- Improved continuity of learning in talk-heavy lessons.
- Track frequency of successful non-verbal/low-verbal demonstrations before pushing to wider response options.
- Monitor whether changes in staff or room predict participation drop-off so transition support can be added.
Escalation and specialist review indicators
- No participation route feels safe even with non-verbal options.
- Worsening anxiety or school avoidance patterns.
- Learning evidence remains minimal across settings despite consistent ladder use.
Evidence / further reading
Key sources that inform this SEND learning strategy. These links are for implementation context and professional review.
- EEF: Special Educational Needs in Mainstream Schools
Education Endowment Foundation | Tier B
Classroom guidance
Secondary mainstream classroom context.
- SEND Code of Practice 0 to 25 years
Department for Education | Tier B
Statutory guidance
Secondary mainstream classroom context.
- Hampshire County Council: OAP and SEND support (March 2025)
Hampshire County Council | Tier B
Classroom guidance
Local authority OAP and SEND classroom/implementation guidance; useful as practical mainstream school guidance alongside statutory and evidence-review sources.
- Southampton City Council: Ordinarily Available Provision Guidance (July 2024)
Southampton City Council | Tier B
Classroom guidance
Local authority ordinarily available provision guidance with practical environmental, APDR, and need-area provision detail for mainstream settings.
Relevant SEND Needs
Related behaviour strategies
Learning strategies remain in a separate database; links below open behaviour strategies that align with this support pattern.
Micro-choice (bounded options)
Think–Write–Pair–Share (processing time for all)
Confidence ladder: Team–Pair–Solo
Co-regulation micro-routine (calm body, calm brain)
Use proactive relationship ‘micro-moments’ (brief, genuine connection)