SEND Learning Strategy

LS019: Structured reading routines

Make reading a predictable process so text is not a hidden barrier to learning.

Teach one simple routine and use it consistently: preview -> chunk -> capture -> check. The goal is not more reading; it is accessible reading that reliably produces understanding.

Tags

Back to SEND learning strategies

Implementation steps

  1. Choose a single routine that fits your subject texts and keep it consistent for at least a half-term.
  2. Model the routine using a short, high-success text first (so students learn the method, not just the content).
  3. Teach chunking rules (where to stop, what to do at each stop).
  4. Add a capture method (one-sentence summary, key-term list, or short retrieval question).
  5. Build a check step (pair paraphrase, mini-quiz, or read-cover-recall of key lines).
  6. Pre-plan accessible copies and chunk points so reading tasks do not start with board-copy or format barriers.
  7. Define which vocabulary or command words need pre-teaching before the reading routine starts.

Classroom routines

  • Preview (30 seconds): title, headings, images, and any key words on the board.
  • Chunk: read a short section (3-6 lines or one paragraph), then stop.
  • Capture: write one sentence ('This section is mainly about...') or three key terms.
  • Check: answer one or two retrieval questions or do a quick pair paraphrase ('Tell your partner what that paragraph means').
  • Use selective highlighting rules: highlight only key terms or phrases that answer the question (not whole paragraphs).
  • Use read-cover-recall for key definitions: read -> cover -> write or say -> check.
  • Preview headings, visuals, and key words before reading, then chunk and capture in a consistent sequence.
  • Use pair paraphrase with enough wait time so slower processing does not become a participation penalty.
  • Keep the reading routine visible (preview, chunk, capture, check) while students work independently.

Adaptation guidance

  • Provide dual-format input: printed copy and on-screen with larger font or spacing where needed.
  • Use short teacher read-aloud for the first chunk, then shared or paired reading.
  • Reduce chunk size and increase checks for slow processing or working-memory barriers.
  • Pre-teach 2-3 high-leverage words (not 15) before reading starts.
  • Offer alternative access routes (audio, captioned video, simplified layout) while keeping the same learning goal.
  • Use accessible print/layout, reduced chunk size, and command-word clarification before comprehension questions.
  • Provide audio or adult-modelled first chunk while keeping the same comprehension goal.
  • Use copies of text and questions together to reduce split attention between locations.

Staff language prompts

  • In one sentence, what was that paragraph mainly about?
  • Which word or phrase is the key idea we need to remember?
  • Tell your partner what it means: no quoting, use your own words.
  • Cover the text: can you recall the definition accurately?
  • Which part of the text answers the question? Point to it.
  • Preview first, then read one chunk, then capture the main idea in one sentence.
  • Take thinking time before the paraphrase; accuracy matters more than speed.

Pitfalls to avoid

  • Telling students to 'just read it' without a process.
  • Using highlighting as decoration rather than evidence selection.
  • Chunks that are too long, with no capture or check step.
  • Assuming silent reading equals comprehension.
  • Changing reading routines frequently so students have to relearn the method each lesson.
  • Setting reading plus question tasks without a visible chunk-capture-check process.

Impact checks

  • More students able to extract meaning from subject texts independently.
  • Improved accuracy when answering text-based questions.
  • Reduced cognitive overload and better sustained attention during reading tasks.
  • Better retention of key definitions and explanations from texts.
  • Track whether structured reading routines reduce non-starts and improve text-question accuracy.

Escalation and specialist review indicators

  • Reading comprehension remains very weak despite consistent structured routines.
  • Marked distress or shutdown during reading tasks.
  • Significant decoding or language barriers indicate need for targeted specialist intervention.

Evidence / further reading

Key sources that inform this SEND learning strategy. These links are for implementation context and professional review.

Relevant SEND Needs

Related behaviour strategies

Learning strategies remain in a separate database; links below open behaviour strategies that align with this support pattern.