SEND Learning Strategy
LS004: Worked examples and fade
Model expert thinking and gradually release responsibility.
Use worked examples to make decision-making visible, then fade support in planned stages.
Back to SEND learning strategiesImplementation steps
- Define and annotate a high-quality model response.
- Teach with think-aloud decision points.
- Move to partially completed models.
- Fade prompts in planned stages.
- Close with independent attempt and feedback.
Classroom routines
- Show full model before independent work.
- Keep model visible during application.
- Highlight one quality criterion at a time.
- Use paired explanation before independent execution.
- Return to model when misconceptions appear.
- Archive model sequences for retrieval.
- Build a template bank for recurring task types (one per topic). Keep the template stable across lessons.
- Use 'compare to model' checks: students highlight one difference between theirs and the exemplar, then improve.
- Move from full model to partial model to 'write the missing step' and then to an independent attempt.
Adaptation guidance
- Use shorter model chunks for slow-processing learners.
- Separate concept and transcription demand.
- Use dual-coded model annotations.
- Increase guided repetitions before fade.
- Retain ambitious content with clearer structure.
Staff language prompts
- Watch where I decide the next step and why.
- Now complete this part with one prompt removed.
- Compare your method to the model before moving on.
- Start by matching your first step to the model, then complete the next step yourself.
- If you are stuck, return to the last correct step in the example rather than restarting the whole task.
Pitfalls to avoid
- Fading supports too quickly.
- Providing model without explaining decisions.
- Skipping independent retrieval after guided practice.
- Leaving templates un-faded so students never learn to generate structure independently.
- Fading too quickly after one successful attempt without checking retention in a later lesson.
Impact checks
- Track independent accuracy at each fade stage.
- Measure reduction in repeated procedural errors.
- Monitor completion rates for independent tasks.
- Check transfer into new contexts.
- Check whether students can explain why each step is chosen, not only reproduce the sequence.
Escalation and specialist review indicators
- No independent transfer after repeated modelling cycles.
- Persistent collapse once prompts are faded.
- Need for deeper diagnostic assessment and adaptation.
Evidence / further reading
Key sources that inform this SEND learning strategy. These links are for implementation context and professional review.
- EEF Toolkit: Feedback
Education Endowment Foundation | Tier A
Evidence review
Secondary mainstream classroom context.
- EEF Toolkit: Metacognition and Self-regulation
Education Endowment Foundation | Tier A
Evidence review
Secondary mainstream classroom context.
- Hampshire County Council: OAP and SEND support (March 2025)
Hampshire County Council | Tier B
Classroom guidance
Local authority OAP and SEND classroom/implementation guidance; useful as practical mainstream school guidance alongside statutory and evidence-review sources.
- Southampton City Council: Ordinarily Available Provision Guidance (July 2024)
Southampton City Council | Tier B
Classroom guidance
Local authority ordinarily available provision guidance with practical environmental, APDR, and need-area provision detail for mainstream settings.
Relevant SEND Needs
Vulnerability
May be especially relevant for:
Related behaviour strategies
Learning strategies remain in a separate database; links below open behaviour strategies that align with this support pattern.
Make success visible (worked example + success criteria)
Work-support redirect (remove the ‘stuck’ barrier fast)
Micro-deadlines (start now + short timer)
Success-first restart (rebuild competence before demand)